In a piece he shared on social media, Reno Omokri raised some questions
on the recent release of 82 Chibok schoolgirls by Boko
Haram members.
Read his views below:
Anybody that is not happy that 82 Chibok girls were released
must be a monster whose humanity should be called into question.
I thank God that these girls have been released and I commend the Federal
Government for the feat of ensuring that these girls are reunited with their
families. May God bless PresidentMuhammadu Buhari for providing the
leadership that enabled this to happen.
Having said that, there are some
factual observations I want to raise. What you are about to read is
completely devoid of any opinion. I am just stating facts.
You may not like the facts. You may not even like me. But one thing you
cannot do is ignore the fact. May 5, 2017: 82 Chibok girls were released by
Boko Haram to the Nigerian government after negotiations that involved a
prisoner swap and according to some news reports also included substantial
payments: But questions about this incidence remain.
On May 3, 2017,
internationaAFP News AgencyP News Agencygency, reported that on
Friday April 29, 2017 fighter jets from the Nigerian Airforce had pounded
Boko Haram positions in Balla village, which is 25 miles from Damboa,
just outside Sambisa Forest. Citing intelligence reports, they reported that
the bombing was so intense that several Boko Haram fighters were killed
including the group's deputy leader, Abba Mustapha, alias Malam Abba
and another leader, Abubakar Gashua, alias Abu Aisha, described as a key
person in the group's hierarchy.
The Nigerian Air force emailed a statement to the AFP in support of
these reports on the same day and said "Battle damage assessment
conducted after the strike showed that several leaders of the Boko Haram
terrorist organisation and their followers were killed during the attacks".
Babakura Kolo, a member of the Civilian JTF (a militia registered with
the Nigerian government to help in the fight with Boko Haram) testified
that "a number of commanders were killed."
On May 4, 2017, Boko Haram's leader, Abubakar Shekau, released a video
denouncing and taunting the Nigerian government over the attack and
promising reprisals.
Yet, after this incident on April 29, 2017 that led to
the death of their top commanders and many of their foot soldiers, Boko
Haram still went on to release 82 Chibok girls to the same Nigerian
government that their leader had sworn revenge on exactly a week earlier?
Does this add up? Does this gel with reality? Does this even make sense?
Is Boko Haram that magnanimous? On May 7, 2017, when the girls were
ferried over to the Nigerian Presidential Villa at Aso Rock, Abuja to meet
with President Muhammadu Buhari, photographs released showed them
looking very well fed and robust.
In fact, the next day (May 8) Africa's top blog, Linda Ikeji's blog
published a photo of the released girls side by side with a picture of a
woman and her baby in one of the Internally Displaced Persons camp in
Borno state for a side by side comparison and these Chibok girls, who had
been living rough inside Sambisa forest looked well fed, well groomed and
buxom while the woman in the IDP camp looked haggard and hungry. It
leaves you questioning who has been in captivity and who has been free.
How is this possible?
This is not the first time Chibok girls have been released.
Almost exactly
a year ago, just a week before the current Nigerian administration marked
its first year in office some Chibok girls were also released. Another batch
were released in October 2016.
The thing is that when these girls are released there is a media blackout
on them. No one is allowed near them to interview them. I understand
that they have gone through an ordeal, but Malala also went through a
similar or even worse ordeal and no one shielded her from the press.
Malala Yousafzai was shot at age 15 by the taliban and left unconscious.
She survived and she was threatened by the taliban who threatened to kill
her should they catch her.
Her case was one of clear and present danger.
Yet she was not sequestered from the public even though, like the Chibok
girls, her English was not so good at first. In fact, an international press
tour was arranged for her placing her on the world stage and kickstarting
the activism that earned her a Nobel Prize making her the youngest
person ever to be so awarded.
One would have thought that that is what would have played out for the
released girls. Last October, 21 Chibok girls were release by Boko Haram
after negotiations.
Till date, these girls have been kept from the press. Even
their own parents are not allowed aThe New York Timesew York
TimesTimes York Times piece on them published on March 11, 2017.
The girls are kept in S safe house according to the New York Times.
During the Christmas holidays they were allowed to visit Chibok but were
housed in the home of a "top politician". Their parents were only allowed
to 'visit them'. Soldiers guarded the girls and after some hours asked the
parents of the girls to leave.
On Christmas Day itself, they were denied entry to the politicians house to
see their own children and on January 8, 2017 the girls were returned to
their safe house and according to the New York Times "Neither the public
nor their parents have been able to see them since." No one really knows
what went on with these girls since their abduction. It is all smoke and
mirrors. These girls are innocent.
They did not kidnap themselves. They were pawns in a game whose
puppeteers we do not yet know. No one should raise any questions about
these girls after what they have been through. But surely we can raise
questions about events themselves. Think people. Am I the only one seeing
this?
No comments:
Post a Comment